Previously published as: British Journal of Clinical Governance
Online from: 2003
Subject Area: Health Care Management/Healthcare
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
Downloads: The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 48 times since 2012
Article citation: , (2012) "Reviews of effectiveness", Clinical Governance: An International Journal, Vol. 17 Iss: 3, pp. -
Summaries of abstracts from Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE).
The literature evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of health care interventions is growing year on year, and these studies can be difficult and time consuming to identify and appraise. Systematic reviews can provide reliable information about what is known and not known about the effects of interventions.
But just as with individual studies, systematic reviews can be hard to find, can have methodological flaws and can be difficult to interpret.
Produced by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination at the University of York, DARE assists decision-makers by systematically identifying and describing systematic reviews, appraising their quality and highlighting their relative strengths and weaknesses.
The database provides access to over 21,000 systematic reviews of the effects of health interventions. DARE includes reviews of interventions that are clearly health related; interventions that have the potential to affect health; adverse effects; diagnostic interventions; and reviews of individual patient data.
DARE is currently updated every week.
Details of all systematic reviews in the process of being written are also included on DARE and can be “fast-tracked” on request. Priority is given to requests from the UK National Health Service
DARE is also available as part of the Cochrane Library interface and can also be searched via NHS Evidence.
To read these abstracts in full, visit the DARE database at: www.crd.york.ac.uk/